For many people living through domestic abuse, one of the hardest things is feeling that what is happening may not be taken seriously. Abuse does not always leave visible injuries. It can be gradual, confusing and deeply isolating. It can involve fear, humiliation, control, financial restriction, threats, intimidation and the slow erosion of confidence. That is why a recent Scottish criminal case involving Kimberly Milne has been so significant. It reflects a growing recognition within the law that abusive relationships can have devastating consequences, and that those consequences must not be minimised.
Lee Milne was convicted of culpable homicide and domestic abuse after prosecutors proved that his prolonged abusive behaviour was a significant contributing factor in Kimberly’s death. He was later sentenced to an extended sentence of 11 years, with eight years in custody and a further three years of supervision. This was described by the Crown Office as the first time, following a trial, that an offender had been held criminally responsible for the suicide of their partner.
The importance of this case goes beyond the conviction itself. It sends a message that the law is becoming better able to understand what survivors have known for a long time: domestic abuse is often about power and control, not only physical violence. In her sentencing remarks, Lady Drummond said domestic abuse is rarely about one incident and recognised that physical, psychological and financial abuse can build over time, creating pressure, fear and despair. That language matters. It shows the court acknowledging the cumulative effect of abuse, rather than looking only for one dramatic event.
That shift has been developing in Scotland for some time. The Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018, which came into force in 2019, made it clear that coercive and controlling behaviour is a crime. That was an important step because many victims do not initially describe what they are experiencing as “abuse” if there has not been a single obvious assault. They may instead describe being monitored, belittled, cut off from family, controlled financially, or made to feel frightened in their own home. The law now recognises that these patterns matter.
For clients facing domestic abuse, this case may offer some reassurance. It does not mean every case will result in a criminal prosecution of this kind, and every situation will depend on its own facts and evidence. But it does show that the justice system is increasingly willing to look at the full picture of an abusive relationship. It is more prepared than it once was to understand how coercion and control affect a person’s safety, mental wellbeing and freedom.
Most importantly, this case is a reminder that if you are living with fear, control or intimidation, you are not overreacting and you are not alone. Abuse can be difficult to name, especially when it has become part of daily life. But the law is changing, and it is becoming more willing to hold perpetrators to account for the real harm they cause. For anyone experiencing domestic abuse, that matters.
Should you wish to discuss any of the above, please get in touch with our team.
DISCLAIMER
The content of this page is for information only. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for specific advice. Gibson Kerr Ltd accepts no responsibility for the content of any third party website to which this webpage refers. Gibson Kerr Ltd is regulated by the Law Society of Scotland.